- Summary of the Sikh Case for Independence

 The recent nuclear tests started by the Indian regime are an dangerous

escalation of the already tense status-quo existing in southasia. Why such

a poor third world country, and the Brahmanist elites who run it, would

embark on such a dangerously belligerent course threatening the stability

of Asia begs questions about the nature of the Indian state, its

ideological basis, and the motivations, outlook and agenda of the

Brahmanist-caste cliques (7% of Hindus) forming the Indian regime and

Brahmanist Order since 1947.

The western countries have been caught off-guard by the nuclear belligerence

shown of the Brahmanist regime and there has been discussion about "policy

and intelligence failure" regarding India. The articles below provide

information and analysis on the REAL nature of the post-colonial Brahmanist

empire, the hegemonic and supremacist ideological framework on which it is

founded and within which it operates and its "Swadeshi" political economy

(Brahmanist "milking cow"). This information will be useful in

understanding the REAL and TRUE India and its new ruling circles by going

beyond the very successful veil of propaganda and slogans (e.g. "world's

largest democracy", "secular constitution") spun by Brahmanist

propagandists, intellectuals and obfuscators who firmly control the

political, administrative, intellectual and informational environment in

India.

Nature and Composition of the Government of India (GOI) - the Brahmanist Empire

The India Union is in reality a model of a Casteocracy run by the 7%

Orthodox Brahminical Castes (OCs: Brahmins, Banias, Kayasths) or

Brahmanists who came to hijack the biggest chunk of the former British

Indian empire in 1947 and have been cleverly running the Brahmanist empire

under the ruse of "world's biggest democracy" for the past 50 years.
 

The Brahmins (3.5% of "Hindus") alone control over 70% of the top

decision-making posts in the political system, administration, judiciary,

army, police, press, media and academics (Statistics on composition from

1935 and 1985 have been published by Indian Journalist and Historian

Kushwant Singh). For example, in 1935, the 3.5% Brahmin caste group held

around 4% of the gazetted positions among Indians in the upper echelons of

the administrative machinery. By 1985, one finds that out of 3,300 Indian

Administrative Officers (IAS), 2,376 are Brahmins; from the rank of deputy

secretaries upwards, out of 500, 310 are Brahmins; of the 26 state chief

secretaries, 19 are Brahmins; of the 16 Supreme Court judges, 9 are

Brahmins; of 438 district magistrates, 250 are Brahmins; and so on in other

circles of power and policy in the Indian state. 

Adding the remaining Brahmanical castes (Banias, Kayasths), the state power

of the Brahmanists jumps from 70% to almost 95%. The facts show that

Brahmanists control the top positions in India's political system,

administrative system, judiciary, press, media, army, etc. - and hence the

actions and policies of the Government of India (GOI). Intriguingly, the

Brahmanists did not control/rule even ONE single

Raj-dhani/administration/army in any country of southasia prior to British

Raj in the 19th century.  

Some examples and persistent patterns of GOI policies and actions:

- Breaking agreements/promises on peaceful use of western atomic

technology to develop weapons of mass destruction (e.g. 1973, 1998;

Canada, US, France, Britain);

- Refusal to implement UN resolutions for plebiscite on Kashmiri;

- Vitriolic and belligerent Indo-Pak, Indo-China, Indo-Srilanka

relations;

- Creation of an extremely centralist, interventionist, and hegemonic

state after 1947 (contrary to "loose federation" promised earlier);

- Inability to solve political problems without state violence/genocide;

- Betrayal of "sacred and solemn" promises to Sikhs and Punjabis which

brought territories of East Punjab and Kashmiri into the Indian Union;

- State sponsored/organized approved killings of non-Hindu religious

communities under cover of "mob riots" (against Sikhs, Muslims);

- Army operation Bluestar/Woodrose in Punjab, attack on 38 Sikh shrines

including Golden Temple in Amritsar leading to killings of 105,000

Sikhs (US State Department estimates for 1984-93, see below);

- State oppression/genocide and army/police rule in all non-Hindu

majority states of Punjab, Kashmiri, Nagaland, Assam, Manipur,

Mizoland;

- Dismal record on human rights and perpetual police/army abuses of

Dalits and "backward castes" (80% of Hindus);

- Permit and License Raj economy designed to divert economic development

and wealth to benefit Brahmanist cliques by restricting private

investment in non-agrarian sectors to Brahmanists only ("Swadeshi

and Permit Raj Economics");

- After 50 years of Brahmanist imperial rule and pillaging, India is now

hovering near sub-Saharan Africa in terms of per capita income, mass

education, public health/hygiene.

- A criminalized and corrupted political/administrative system in which

criminals/politicians work hand-in-glove; . . . etc.

It is truly amazing that such a brutal, supremacist, corrupt and

criminalized Casteocracy has been created under the ruse of a "world's

largest secular democracy"! 

It is worth noting that all these Brahmanical elites are "new elites". This

community did not have ruling-class status in any country of southasia when

the British began creating "India" during the 18-19th century. But one

wouldn't guess this from the hegemonic and supremacist historical and

social propaganda of neo-Brahmanists in which OCs, lead by the "learned,

wise, and revered Brahmins", portray themselves as the "rightful rulers" of

"their Hindustan" and Hindu flock.

Ideological Basis of the Casteocracy

In totality, the nature, actions, outlook and policies of the hegemonic and

supremacist Brahmin-lead Casteocracy to take shape after the transfer of

power from the British in 1947 begin to elucidate themselves upon examining

the socio-political ideological underpinnings of neo-Brahmanism.

As the British Raj ("India") expanded from its base in the eastern

subcontinent (Bengal/eastern gangetic region) during the 19th century,

newly western educated ideologues from the Orthodox Brahmanical Castes

(OCs) began a new socio-political program to advance their community's own

political and imperialistic ambitions. A new supremacist identity and

history (neo-Brahmanism) was invented for OCs by making wild, hegemonic and

fraudulent claims over the history, religions and civilizations of

historically separate southasian regions, nations and peoples. Under these

historical doctrines, Brahmanist ideologues, politicians and organizations

(e.g. Vivekananda, Dayananda, Gowalker; RSS, Arya Samaj, Hindu-Maha-Saba,

VHP, etc.) from the eastern gangetic region began imagining ALL of

southasia under British rule as their "10,000 year old ONE HINDU NATION"

(Hindustan) in which the 7% Brahmanists, the self-styled "superior Aryans",

should be the "rightful ruling and dominating class".

Plain facts of history, however, tell us that southasia is in reality a

multinational/ethnic/linguistic/cultural region (like Europe) whose oldest

region - the northwest - was politically separate from the rest of

subcontinent for over 90% of its known 3500 years history prior to

annexation to British India during the 19th century. Moreover, Southasia

was mostly Buddhist for 11-14 centuries prior to the 9th century AD; the

northern and western subcontinent were almost never under Brahmanist

political-military rule and domination during any known period; indeed, the

terms "Hindusthan" and "Hindu" as social and national constructs were

introduced into southasia by a 12th century Afghan dynasty of Muhammad

Ghori (please see next Section.)

Historical propaganda and supremacist claims designed to float the

Brahmanists' ONE HINDU NATION (really a Poorbia Brahmanist empire - "Hindu,

Hindi, Hindustan") were further refined and exported to newly annexed

regions by OC ideologues, politicians, socio-political organizations, civic

associations, schools and political parties during the late 19th and early

20th century (e.g. Arya Samaj founded in 1873, RSS formed in 1925). The

pre-independence national politics of Brahmanist dominated political

organizations, regardless of party or political affiliation, was rooted in

the historical consciousness and hegemonic "One Hindu Nation" ideology

and doctrines spawned by Neo-Brahmanism.

The first empowerment phase of the Brahmanist political program ("Soft

Hindutva") was achieved in 1947 with the transfer of power from Great

Britain to the Brahmanists controlling the Congress Party. Through their

subsequent domination over the state polity, governmental apparatus,

education system, state-run mass media and press, Indians have been

saturated and brainwashed with neo-Brahmanical doctrines for the past 50

years. After consolidation of power and entrenchment of their

"Hinduization" agenda during the first 3 decades of state power, present

political developments (e.g. rise of BJP) mark transition to the "Hard

Hindutva" spectrum of the Brahmanist program. Increasingly, Brahmanists and

their loyal camp are becoming more confident of shedding the "secular

democratic"=20front, which has served them very well, to openly proclaim

and implement the casteist, chauvinistic and fascist core of

Neo-Brahmanism.

Brahmanist Historical Propaganda

The 19th century neo-Brahmanist historical themes and propaganda were

designed for the purpose of inventing a new proud elitist identity and

history for Orthodox Caste Hindus (Brahmins/Banias - 7%) and for furthering

their political and imperialistic ambitions in a ONE HINDU NATION - to be

naturally ruled and dominated by the "superior" Brahmanists. However, the

dateless and placeless fantasies and mithya of neo-Brahmanism constructed

to promote these contentions do injustice to the most basic known and

verifiable facts of southasian history:

1) Southasia has historically been a multi-national/cultural/ethnic/

linguistic region, like Europe or the middle-east. There has never

been a ONE NATION or country in southasia. A few short regional

empires arose, crumbling under their own weight within a few decades

(e.g. Mauryan Empire, lasted 92 years).

As a historical/political entity, Winston Churchill likened it to an

imaginary line like the equator: "India is merely a geographical

expression. It is no more a single country than the equator." 

2) The fantasy of southasia as a "One Hindu Nation" under Brahmanist

rule never existed. For example, the oldest northwest region of

southasia - Punjab - was politically unified to the rest of

subcontinent less than 10% of its known 3300 years history (that

too under Buddhist and Muslim regimes) prior to annexation in 1847. 

3) Major periods of the historically separate Punjab region (northwest):

a) Vedic Period of Saptha Sindhva (1500-500 BC)

b) Gandharan Buddhist (400 BC-900 AD)

Gandhara constituted the present day regions of eastern

Afghanistan and Punjab. The region formed the hub of the

silk trade routes and was economically, religiously and

culturally well connected to central asia, China, the middle

east and southasia. Scholars came from all over the known

world to study Gandharan Buddhism, philosophy, sciences, and

arts at international centers of learning and commerce situated

at Jalandhara, Moga, Taxila, Sialkot, Kabul and Balkh

(E.Punjab, W.Punjab and Afghanistan)

c)Post Buddhist (post 900 AD): Influx of Gangetic/Malabari

Brahmanism from south (Shankarcharya of Malabar) and Islam

from north. Local development of Punjabi Sufism and Sikhism

(11-18th century) which are threads of continuity with th

region's relatively egalitarian and humanistic Gandharan

spiritual and cultural traditions and heritage. 

4) The term "Hindusthan" was first used by a 12th century AD Afghan

dynasty of Muhammad Ghori who dubbed his new subjects "Hindus".

Prior to this era, no one in any region of southasia had ever used

these terms to define themselves.

5) There is no mention of either of these terms in "ancient"

Brahmanical books (oldest of which do not predate the 11th century;

also the oldest "Brahmanical" temples are all post Buddhist, after

8-9th century A.D.). Ironically, two of the three core concepts of

the Poorbia Brahmanist imperialistic program of "Hindu and

Hindusthan" are borrowed from post-12th century Muslim (Afghan and

Mogul) regimes.

6) Buddhism mixed with Saka (Indo-Scythian) religious practices (e.g.

sun worship) comprised the dominant religious influence (Gandharan

Buddhism) in Punjab and the northwest for almost 1300 years prior

to 900 A.D. Buddhism was also dominant in other regions prior to

8-9th century. 

7) Brahmanist propaganda contends that their despised "lower caste"

shudras and Dalits ("inferior lower castes" - 80% of "Hindus") gave

up egalitarian Buddhism for the chains of Brahmanism (Hinduism)

voluntarily during 8-10th century AD to live under a new Brahmanical

Hindu order and law system granting them nil legal, human, social,

religious rights and dignity and considered them "too polluted" to

be allowed into Brahmin temples and read Brahmanical scriptures.

Foreign travelers from China and Tibet (e.g. Huen Tsang,

Sharmasvamin) of the time and Brahmanical texts themselves contradict

the peaceful conversion of Buddhist India to Brahmanical India

assertion (e.g. the "Sankara-digvijayam" text of the 14th century

records that Suddhanvan "issued orders to put to death all the

Buddhists from Ramesvaram to the Himalayas"). Indeed, the

extirpation of Buddhism in southasia occurred through a Brahmanical

policy of systematic genocide and terror. After the Brahmanists

gained religious influence over southasian ruling groups between

8-11th century, the majority Buddhist masses were terrorized,

pillaged and raped into giving up the Buddha and Buddhism by

organized gangs and their temples, universities, institutions and

property seized. They were then ground into "Shudra" and

"untouchables" castes after being politically, religiously and

economically disempowered. 

8) Even the most revered Buddhist monument (Buddh-Gaya) where Lord

Buddha departed for Nirvana is a disputed Buddhist-Brahmin site

and the Casteocracy's Supreme Court has failed to issue its verdict

after over 50 years! 

9) In the northwest and north, the Brahmanists have almost never formed

the ruling class over any known period of history. The recorded

rulers over 3500 years of known history have been drawn from the

followings groups and their descendants: British, Sikhs/Jats/

Rajputs, Afghans, Moguls, Indo-Scythians (Sakas), Bactrian Greeks

and Vedics. 

10)From geographical information in the RigVeda, the Vedic Period

(1500-500BC) was confined to the northwest (Saptha Sindhva:

Punjab/Sindh). The hyms tell that the Vedic peoples worshiped

non-Brahmanical Gods (Indra, Varuna, Mitra), ate cows, elected

their chiefs, and drank liqor and called the people living to the

south in the gangetic region "Dasyas"! Moreover, main Gangetic

religious texts (e.g. Puranas) like the Mahabharta and

VarnaAshramDharma of Manu "forbids Brahmins" from even going to

Punjab and depict dark Dravidian Gods like Shiva and Krishna

fighting and defeating Vedic Aryan gods like Indra. Despite the

racial complexes developed by Poorbia Brahmanists during British

rule, there is overwhelming evidence of Brahmanism (Hinduism)

being of Dravidian origin from the gangetic region (Gangasthan). 

11)Since their creation in the late 19th and early 20th century,

Poorbia Brahmanist organizations (e.g. Arya Samaj, RSS) have been

actively involved in spreading anti-Punjab and anti-Sikh propaganda

to polarize, fragment, subvert and communalize Punjabi society and

to create a sense of inferiority among Punjabis by erasing,

distorting, marginalizing and degrading Punjabi history, culture

and language. 

Bhiya infiltration organizations and the Indian regime have been

brainwashing Punjabis to disown their ancient Punjabi language

and cultural heritage and accept the Poorbias' "superior Aryan

language and culture" (e.g. Hindi extracted from Sanskritized

Urdu in the 19th century; Urdu developed as a Mogul court language

from modifications and mixtures of the local khari-boli dialect

spoken in the Delhi region with Persian and Arabic).

Plain facts supported by the RigVeda tell, however, that the Vedic

civilization of Saptha Sindhva was a Punjabi civilization and, by

historical logic, Punjabiyat is necessarily the most direct and

authentic living offspring of the region's ancient Vedic cultural

and linguistic roots. Moreover, the eastern gangetic heartland is

not only historically a separate region, but geographically resides

over 1500 miles to the southeast of the Saptha Sindhva country.

Amazingly, the Indus valley civilization (pre-2000 BC), the Vedic

civilization (1500-500BC) and the Gandharan Buddhist civilization

(400BC-900AD), followed by development of Punjabi Sufism and

Sikhism (12-18th century AD), all transpired on the soil of the

Punjab and yet according to Brahmanist historical dogma,

the caste-based Gangasthani Brahmanical culture, society and

history is "superior" to Punjabi culture, history and language

- a product of its civilizations and eras stretching over 3500

years of known and verifiable history!

12) Political control over the northwest subcontinent post 500 BC

(Gandharan period) was primarily in the hands of Sakas (Scythians)

and their descendents who mainly patronized Buddhism prior to 9th

century AD. Based on analysis of coins, inscriptions, archeological

finds and early Indian/Buddhist/Chinese/Greek/Persian manuscripts

dating back to 500 BC, historians and ethnographers (e.g.

Cunningham, Tod, Rapson, Ibbetson, Elliot, Ephilstone, Dahiya,

Dhillon, Banerjea, Sharma, Sinha, Shrava, Puniya etc.) have shown

that the traditional agrarian and artisan communities (e.g.

Jats/Gujars/Tarkhans/Khatris/Rajputs/Lohars/Yadavs etc.) of the

entire northwest are the descendants of Scythian tribes from central

Asia (an aggressive and expansionist old Iranian speaking culture)

who settled north-western southasia in successive waves between 5th

century B.C. to 5th century AD. Sociological and ethnological

information collected in colonial censuses shows that the

majority (+65%) of the population of the northwest ("Sakasthan"

including Punjab, Rajasthan, Gujarat, northern Maharashtra and

western UP) is of Saka origin. Terms like "Sakasthana" appear

on ancient Saka inscriptions found as far as Mathura in western

Uttar Pradesh (formerly, United Provinces).

Major dynasties/rulers of Punjab and the northwest of Saka

origin include Porus (4th century BC), Mauryas, Azes, Azilises,

Vima Kadphises, Soter Megas, Maues, Kanishka, Rudradaman, . . .

Harshavardhan, AnangPal, JaiPal (11th century AD). The demise of

the Mogul-Rajput empire in the 17th and early 18th century was

due largely to the Saka political revival in the west and northwest

as expressed by the rise of Maratha, Jat and Sikh power under the

leadership of Gokhla, Shivaji, Churuman, Suraj Mal, Banda Bahadur,

Bhagel Singh, Ranjit Singh, etc.

While the plains facts of history clearly contradict the supremacist and

hegemonic claims Poorbia Brahmanists began making on southasia during the

19th century, this historical quackery and the elitist neo-Brahmanist

identity (the "superior Aryans") and chauvinistic socio-political doctrines

derived from it have been the founding ideology and the "historical

consciousness" of the new Indian Brahmanist Order.  

From British Raj to Casteocracy

The Brahmanists came to power on the Congress elephant by deviously

converting the pre-independence political debate and struggle into a

communal Hindu-Muslim religious struggle. This was made possible by the

master stroke of Mahatama Gandhi - the Hindu nationalist cum holy sadhu

who made "Hindus" a 55% majority on paper in the 1920s upon getting the

Dalits or "untouchables" (20%) dubbed as "Hindus" by the British. This coup

moved the "Hindus" from 35% to a 55% majority in British India. In pre-independence India, Muslims were

25%;=Sikhs/Christians/Buddhists/tribals/etc. formed the remaining 20%.

This action, along with recognition of Congress as the sole political

representative of all Indians in national matters, was a payoff by the

British colonial authorities to the Brahmanist lead Congress and Gandhi for

loyal services rendered to Queen and empire in supporting their WWI war

effort; recruiting the "martial" communities (e.g. Sikhs, Jats, Rajputs,

Gujars of Saka-origin) of the northwest and Muslims to go fight for the

British Empire in Europe/middle east; subduing, opposing, infiltrating and

sabotaging other non-Congress/non-Brahmanist lead political parties and

independence movements organized at home (who saw British weakness during the war as an ideal opportunity). 

The 55% fraudulent "Hindu pile" was little more than a political game of

Brahmanist politicians and political parties in Delhi while caste Hindus

would not eat/touch/marry/socialize or even worship with their "polluted"

Dalits (20% untouchables) in the 1920s. After this "victory on paper",

Brahmanist politicians, political parties, and organizations totally

communalized pre-independence politics along "Hindu/Muslim" religious lines

of "nationhood" to get on the road to empire and Delhi. 

The British to their merit left Indians a functional parliamentary system

served by a small but efficient administrative system which did not

tolerate corruption. While glibly taking of egalitarian western political

philosophies, the Brahmanists quickly established a blubbering Casteocracy

with a mammoth political and administrative system under the banner of

pseudo-socialism. Almost all of the top decision-making and managerial

positions (95%) in the country's administration, bureaucracy, state-run

media, press, huge state-run economic sector, universities, army, police,

etc. have been stacked by Brahmanists who form 7% of Hindus. Under

Permit Raj and Swadeshi Economics, only the Brahmanist cliques have been allowed to invest and enter the new modern and profitable industrial and manufacturing sectors while the rest of Indians are tied to the plough, dwindling lands and the unskilled labor market. 

Under Indian agrarian policies, ridiculous land ceilings of 18acres/household were set and agricultural prices have been historically set at 50% below prevailing world prices (Brahmanists are traditionally non-landowners and non-agriculturalists). Meanwhile, no such controls or ceilings were ever imposed on ownership of urban property and industries (requiring government permits/licenses for entry) and the industrial price index in India has been above the international industrial price index.

Over the past 50 years, such neo-colonialist policies have precipitated a massive transfer of wealth from the highly productive "Saka region" in the northwest (e.g. Punjab, Haryana, Rajasthan, Gujarat and western UP) into the hands of Brahmanists monopolizing the upper level bureaucratic machinery, the agro-industries and the wider industrial/manufacturing sector with which the agrarian sector exchanges production. The tremendous wealth generated by the "Green revolution" in the northwest has been siphoned-off through the state-run banking system and these savings diverted to fund the massive, inefficient, stagnant and corrupted state-run industrial sector where again Brahmanist managers and officials roost the nest.

Through unbridled corruption and criminalization of the state machinery in the post-British period, the political and governmental system has been quickly converted into a huge rent-seeking "milking cow" for the enrichment and exploitation of the "superior" Brahmanists (who prior to 1947 held little family property or wealth). Genocidal state terror and violence has been unleashed on the populations of every non-Hindu majority state in the Indian Union (e.g. Kashmir, Punjab, Assam, Manipur, Mizoland, Nagaland, etc.) and the "lower castes" and Dalits (untouchables) live under constant threat of random police violence and torture to keep them under submission and to discourage them from mobilizing politically.

This is the true hideous nature of the Casteocracy, imperialistically running the old British empire and motivated by the hegemonic, supremacist and racist socio-political ideology of neo-Brahmanism.

Unfortunately, Western opinion on events in India has been largely shaped by the Brahmanist viewpoint by virtue of their control over the governmental machinery/political system/academics/state-run mass media/press/etc. in India. Brahmanists have been extremely effective in propagating their historical and political mithya and propaganda and hiding, deflecting and scapegoating India's gruesome realities and the Casteocracy's failures and tyranny on their victims, lower castes and religious minorities. 

Southasia in the 21st Century: Collapse of Brahmanist Empire - Silk Road Reopens

There has been some discussion in certain Washington circles regarding

western long-run economic and strategic interests in supporting internal

national movements in southasia seeking to disband the largest remnant of

the former British Empire by the start of the 21st century. The failed and

artificial 50 year old Brahmanist empire would give way to smaller,

friendly and more governable countries (with populations of 100-200

million) fully integrated with the global economy and open to western

capital and goods. The Silk Road reopens!

This development would be a great "steroid dose" for western economies in

the 21 century as they obtain unhindered access to a realigned southasia's

latent market of 1 billion consumers freed from Brahmanist economic and

political imperialism (i.e. Permit Raj, Swadeshi Economics). The vast

majority of Indians will benefit from release from the Brahmanist empire in

which the 7% Brahmanists control all the top positions in government,

bureaucracy, state-run industries and corner the wealth of the private

sector through Permit Raj. Such pillaging and rent-seeking policies, while

enriching the supremacist Casteocrats, have lead to stagnation and economic

backwardness for over 85% of Indians; 45% of whom live in abject poverty.

After 50 years of Brahmanist rule, India is now hovering near sub-saharan

Africa in per capita income, education, public health and hygiene. Many in

India, if given the choice, would gladly choose British imperialism to

Brahmanist imperialism.

Many nationalities (e.g. Punjab, Kashmir, Assam, Manipur, Nagaland, Tamil

Nadu etc.) under the Brahmanist knife want "out" of the Casteocracy. For

example the Punjabis lost control of Punjab region to the British in 1847

after 3 years of Anglo-Sikh Wars. As late as 1946 (Cabinet Mission

Proposal) the British representative Sir Robert Cripps apprised the Sikh

leadership (Tara Singh) of their 3 options: i) form independent Punjab

country, ii) confederate with Pakistan or iii) Join the Indian Union. Under

lavish and "solemn promises and pledges" of Nehru and Mahatma Gandhi to the=

"brave Sikhs", the Sikh leadership decided to join the Indian Union.

Needless to say, all promises "of setting up an autonomous region in the

north" and a "loose federation" were betrayed and a concerted policy aimed

of reducing the Sikhs politically and bringing them under Poorbia

Brahmanist cultural, linguistic, social, economic and religious domination

was instituted. In 1983, the Brahmanist policy in Punjab switched from

hegemonic control to violent control - Stalinist Style.

Similar tactics have been used in other non-majority Hindu states like Kashmir, Assam, Manipur, Nagaland, etc. where pre-independence promises and constitutional rights have been denied, democratically elected state governments deposed and protests against mistreatment and demands for their constitutional rights met with military invasion, state terror and genocide. The US State Department estimates (figures in 1993 letter of 23 US Congressmen/Senators to President Clinton) that over "105,000" Sikhs had been killed in extra-judicial killings by the Casteocracy's 500,000 army/paramilitary troops in the state between 1983-93 supposedly chasing Indira Gandhi's "300 militants" of 1983 (excuse stated in Parliament to bring Punjab under Army Rule).

The Western democracies should support the right for self-determination of

nations in the failed and artificial Indian Union who wish to declare

theirsovereignty. India is signatory to UN articles asking states to respect

the right of self-determination of its peoples/nations. The dismal human

rights records and persistent documented genocides of nationalities,

religious minorities and the "lower" castes by the Casteocracy should be

cited to justify imposition of trade sanctions and oil embargo if the

Brahmanists don't release nations and countries democratically declaring

their sovereignty in state assemblies (e.g. Croatia, Slovenia, Ukraine,

Scotland, etc.). This will shutdown the Indian economy/tanks within 3

months and lead to a complete breakdown of Brahmanist coercive authority.

In these circumstances, even the loyalty of the army and police would be

questionable: the majority of middle and low level officers and army men

and policemen who carry out the policies of the regime and take orders from

their Brahmanist bosses are from the non-Brahmanical community

(tribes/ethnic-castes of Saka origin such as Jats, Rajputs, Gujars,

Marathas, Sikhs, etc.). This external policy along with international and

UN recognition will enable trapped nationalities and countries in southasia

(the "fourth world") to re-establish their sovereignty. These newly

emergent states may subsequently form a loose economic federation where

each country retains political and administrative independence and control

but integrate economically.

Such a scenario would also provide western capitalist democracies, and the

US in particular, a means for getting rid of the Swadeshi Brahmanist Empire

and allow open, pro-western, nuclear-free, pro-capitalist countries and

regimes to develop at the start of the 21st century. The subcontinent, with

its latent market of one billion consumers could serve as a tremendous

economic growth engine for the West for the next century.

Reorientation and realignment of southasia along historical national

realities and more sensible "scales of governance" will help southasian

nations move out of the "Hindu rate of growth" and unleash the peoples'

dynamism and potential tied up in an extremely retrograde, centralist,

rent-seeking, Permit Raj, and hegemonic political economy (Brahmanist

"milking cow"). Complete access of western products, know-how,

technology and investment to this huge market will rejuvenate western economies and

lift them into +8% GDP growth rate well into the middle of the next century

(a much amplified version of the impact on the US of post-WWII European

and Japanese reconstruction). As a by-product, southasia finally gets

economically developed with the collapse of the 50 year old Swadeshi

Casteocracy and Brahmanist Empire. 

Information Sources on India

To get wider and more complete understanding of political and human rights

issues in India, it is important that westerners also obtain information,

analysis and commentary from non-official Indian sources (e.g. NGOs, human rights groups, and exiled groups such as the Council of Khalistan) and the non-Brahmanist community rather than exclusively relying on the version of events and commentary from Brahmanist obfuscators, denialists and spinsters. The mass state-run television and radio media ("Casteocracy's Pravda") and the Brahmanist-dominated press and newspapers in India is extremely effective in saturating Indians with Brahmanist political and historical propaganda. The Brahmanist castes are very fond of blaming and scapegoating the failures and abysmal achievements of their failed Casteocracy and its genocidal actions and policies on religious minorities (e.g. Sikhs, Christians, Muslims), the "lower castes" and Dalits (all of above form over 90% of Indians) and the perpetual "foreign hand" (e.g. CIA-US, ISI-Pakistan, expatriate "Khalistanis", China, Britian, etc.).

Westerners should also take the versions and claims of Indian

officials/sources and Brahmanists that defy basic common sense and known

facts with a few "grains of salt" and insist on hard verifiable

collaborating evidence for their claims. It is also advisable to travel

directly to the localities and regions concerned with the events and news

to obtain direct information from the local population rather than rely on

the interpretation of Brahmanist journalists, state-run media, hacks and

newsmen in Delhi or other cities.

Some estimates are given below on the Brahmanist regimes genocide and state

terror against the Sikhs concentrated in Punjab (68%) and Delhi.

Source of Estimates of Genocide of 125,000 Sikhs since 1984

When the army was sent to Punjab in 1983 by the Casteocracy, Indira Gandhi

stated in parliament that approximately "300 militants" were disturbing the

rule of law as an excuse to bring Punjab under army rule and unleash state

terror against the majority Sikh population. (Ironically, Indira Gandhi and

her Congress party was arming and building up the leader of these militants

- Bhindrawale - herself between 1981-82.)

By 1993, US State Department estimates 105,000 Sikhs had been killed by the

Casteocracy (figures quoted in letter of 23 U.S. Congressmen/Senators

including Speaker Newt Gingrich and Congressman Dan Burton to President

Clinton). A human rights activist Mr. Jaswant Singh Khalra discovered hard

evidence of the Casteocracy's genocide between 1991-93 by stumbling across

municipal records of police funerals (those killed by police, frequently in

fake encounters or under torture, are usually cremated in police stations;

Mr. Khalra was "disappeared" in Sept. 1995 and is believed to have been

eliminated). In just 2 districts (Amritsar and Tarn Tarn) over this 2 year

period, municipal records mention cremation of 6000 Sikh bodies by the

police/army.

Extrapolating, this to the other districts of Punjab, an estimate of 25,000

extra-judicial killings can be inferred for the 1991-93 period alone. Post

1991, GOI itself admits to giving over 40,000 bounties to the Casteocracy's

uniformed terrorists in Punjab when a puppet Congress regime was installed

after a stage managed vote - with only 15% of Punjabi electorate voting.

These figures are also confirmed by the state-run radio/television media and

the country's Brahmanist Press. During the period of state terror in

Punjab, the Brahmanical media would celebrate Sikh killings in newspapers

between 20-30 per day - by honoring the names of army/police men who killed

Sikhs in fake encounters or under torture. Over the 1984-91 period of army

rule in Punjab an estimated total of 25(avg.killings/day)x365(days/year)x11(years of genocide) =3D 100,375

Sikh killings by GOI. This estimate from Indian sources collaborates the

U.S. State Department estimate.

The above figures do not include the Sikh Civilians killed by GOI in its

1984 attack on the Golden Temple (10,000-20,000) and those killed by the

regime in Delhi (10,000-20,000). The Congress Party officials who

organized this genocide (e.g. H.K. Bhagat, Sajjan Kumar, Jagdish Tytler, N.

Rao) were REWARDED with cabinet positions in the next government and

oversaw the post-1984 GOI policies in Punjab. Rao, Home Minister during

"riots", went on to become the next PM after Rajiv Gandhi

GOI admits to killing 1500 Sikhs in its army attack by two division on the

Golden Temple (to capture 80 alleged militants) and 2600 Sikhs in Delhi

under state-organized pogoms over 3 days. Estimates of NGOs and Civil

Liberties organizations are much higher. At a minimum, this gives a total

of 125,000 killings between 1984-95. There are other estimates (e.g.

Punjab Human Rights Organization and Punjab Magistracy) of genocide which

go as high as 250,000.

In comparison, the British killed approximately 400 Punjabis in the

Jalliawalla Bagh massacre in 1929 for protesting British Rule. The

Casteocracy's state-run television/radio media in India, the Brahmanist

Press, and OCs in general were going into a mad fit over the Queen's visit

to Amritsar in October 1997, but act as if Operation Bluestar 1984 and

Operation Woodrose 1984-87 (which killed 3000 times more Sikhs) occurred on a different planet and in a previous life.

How do Brahmanists (7% of "Hindus") - guardians of the honor of their

dishonorable Casteocracy and perpetually lying to the world to cover-up its

true nature - square the murder of 125,000 Sikhs by their criminal, corrupt

and genocidal regime with Indira Gandhi's "300 Sikh militants" of 1983 ? 

Summary of Sikh Case for Independence

Given below is a brief list sampling the mistreatments, denial of promises

and rights, and subjugation under genocidal repressionary policies that the

progressive and freedom-loving Sikh-Punjabi nation has had to endure from

the Brahmanist Casteocracy since 1947:

1) Betrayal of promises of political autonomy and cultural

rights under which Punjab entered Indian Union

(Nehru, 1946: " I see nothing wrong with setting up an

autonomous region in the north where the brave Sikhs

can also bask in the glow of freedom").

2) Casteocracy declared "brave Sikhs" as a "criminal tribe"

in 1947 (by Nehru, Patel) immediately after independence.

3) Under the Indian Constitution framed by Brahmanists,

Sikhs are classified as "Hindus". To get a marriage license

in "secular India", Sikhs must sign a form entitled "The

Hindu Marriage Act of 1951".

4) Denial of Punjabi linguistics rights till 1967. All

"Hindu" and non-Jat states were reorganized and given

their linguistic/cultural rights in early 1950s. Over

250,000 Sikhs demonstrated peacefully and courted arrest

in 50s and 60s to get their linguistic rights (this is

5 times the number of Indians arrested by British in the

whole "quit India movement").

5) GOI's active cooperation with Poorbia Brahmanist infiltration

organizations from Bhiyasthan (like RSS/Arya Samaj) in spreading

anti-Punjab and anti-Sikh hate propaganda to i) polarize and

communalize Punjabi society along fradulent "Hindu-Sikh" lines

and ii) twist the regime's 20 year denial of Punjabi linguistic

and cultural rights (in violation of the Indian Constitution

and pre-independence promises) into a communal issue leading

to the tri-partition of East Punjab in 1967.

6) Purposely leaving out 2 majority speaking Punjabi districts

(in reference to 1961 census) out of Punjab state finally

formed in 1967 after 20 years of peaceful protest and

demonstrations.

7) Dismissal of all 5 Akali Govts democratically elected

in Punjab by GOI prior to term completion before 1983.

GOI has been in constant violation of political rights

of Punjabis as granted by the Indian Constitution.

8) Denial of political and economic freedom of Punjabis through

denial of all pre-independence promises on autonomy,

imposition of a centralized unitary system, and Permit and

License Raj.

9) During early 1980s, policy of hegemonic control turned to a

policy of violent control in which over 105,000 Sikhs were

massacred in Delhi, Amritsar and Punjab by the Casteocracy

(figure is from US State Department sources and quoted in

a 1993 letter of 23 US Congressmen/Senators to President Clinton).

All 105,000 were killed supposedly to catch Indira Gandhi's

"300 Sikh militants" of 1983.

10) Engineering political destabilization in Punjab so that army rule

and genocidal state terror/violence could be imposed on Sikhs.

The policy objective was to brutally crush the Sikh population

(Stalinist style) so they would settle for plain peace and life

at any cost (like obedient Shudras) and give up all demands for

implementation of 1946 promises and constitutional rights.

11) Army desecration of 40 historical Gurdwaras throughout Punjab

between 1984-87 (Operation Bluestar and Operation Woodrose)

including the holiest shrine in Sikhdom - the Golden Temple.

It is for these reason that Sikhs/Punjabis of honor (ankh) and conscience

(zameer) cannot consider the India Union to be their country and want their

sovereignty and lands back so they can pursue their political, economic,

cultural and linguistic aspirations in their own country - free from

Brahmanist hegemony, vile, treachery, terror and genocide!

Mahatma Gandhi's speech and solemn promises under which Sikhs gave up

the option to form their own country and join India (Cabinet Mission

Proposal, 1946) gives the Sikhs all the moral authority they need for independence.

He clearly states that if the Congress and GOI betrayed Sikhs, they have

all rights to seek independence and sanctions even armed struggle. India

is also a signatory to UN articles agreeing to respect the right of

self-determination of constituent nations. 

Click here
for Main Page